VIM VS EMACS SOFTWARE
VIM VS EMACS CODE

Which, to compound the injury, will probably get executed, since command mode is the default vi editor mode. The bad thing about vi is that if you sneeze while seated at the keyboard, you've probably managed to press random keys, and just about any random key sequence is a (probably dangerous) vi command. Emacs is bulkier and often not available. If I need to do something quick and dirty, almost all systems have vim/vi installed, so it's there and I can use it. The Vimmers will burn in their own self-created Hell.ДЄctually, for me it mostly boils down to this: The community is still alive and well doing.Д®macs is the One True Editor. There is even one meeting group here in Munich, where people are meeting from time to time to exchange configuration files and new findings/techniques/plugins in Vim. There are groups all around the world that discuss Vim both online and in meetings. I don't know about popularity of Emacs those days, but Vim is certainly not something that can be called 'archaic'. The 'it only lacks a good text editor' came from Vim users during Editor War The joke came from plugins like built in web browsers or email clients that the community wrote. In Emacs case, there is an old joke that 'Emacs is a good operating system, it only lacks a good text editor'. The community wrote a bunch of great stuff over those all years. Vim has a lot of plugins, scripts and configuration files available. I use both Vim and Netbeans, depending on what I work on. On the other hand, IDEs are winning when it comes to tasks like profiling or debugging of bigger projects.

VIM VS EMACS CODE

You can see how work in Vim looks like on those YouTube videos:ДЄs you can see, the speed and minimal effort to write code in editors like Vim is incomparable to the ones in IDEs.

VIM VS EMACS SOFTWARE

Their goal is to provide environment for effective software development in general. IDEs are, as the name says, integrated development environments. Those two are text editors, whose goal is to provide fast and effective text and code editing. Important thing to recognize is that Vim/Emacs shouldn't be compared to IDEs. No need to even leave the editor, as I can execute shell commands from vim as well. The best in it is that I can do work without having to move my hands away from the keyboard.

I can type the code much faster thanks to macros, motions, bunch of other features. No matter if I am using my desktop or connected to a remote server. However, for smaller projects that don't exceed a few files, I definitely prefer vim. For bigger projects I use NetBeans, a good IDE is certainly a better solution here. I am a big fan of vim, but I am not using it 100% of the time. So far vim is leading!ДЇor people unfamiliar with the Editor War: and why it is in the rattlesnake pit.Д®xactly And the poll is a great idea. Notepad++ is really nothing compared to Vim if you look at both features and available plugins/scripts.ДЇred rosenberger wrote:so the question actually become why would you use EITHER of vi or emacs? Vim has built-in plugin for handling editing over FTP, cute & paste, as well as context highlighting. Fred rosenberger wrote:Of course, these days, you can use something like Notepad++, which does ftp behind the scenes to let you edit your files with a real editor - cut, paste, context highlighting.so the question actually become why would you use EITHER of vi or emacs?

Vim vs emacs